Fight for repair costs: water damage in the Salzburg apartment building!

Fight for repair costs: water damage in the Salzburg apartment building!

In a multi -party house in Salzburg, a dispute over the renovation costs causes excitement among the residents. Hans Huber and Bernhard Mühlbacher have been fighting with the developers from LeitgöB Wohnbau for years. It is about more than 100,000 euros that have to be applied in the course of a necessary renovation. In view of the history of water damage in the residential complex, the conflict is particularly explosive.

As early as 2019, Bernhard Mühlbacher Braune Flecken on the ceiling, which indicated water damage. The property manager was informed immediately and a roofer carried out repairs. But the problems did not seem to be resolved. In 2021 and 2022, water damage occurred again, which are probably due to poor installation of the solar system. To avoid further damage, the two residents had the solar system removed at their own expense.

a rotten roof rack and protracted arguments

A professional examination finally brought to light that a wooden roof rack is completely rotten - a fact that endangers the safety of the entire house. Leitgöb Wohnbau initially promised the repair of the damage, but the discussions were in length. A comparison offer that should cover 70 percent of the repair costs was withdrawn by the builders. Several reports now prove the defective attachment of the solar system, but the parties are still far from a solution.

In such cases, the question often arises as to who ultimately arises for the renovation costs. According to Ra-kotz.de, landlords must generally have to pay for damage to the building dance, provided that the tenants have not culpably traded. In the case of water damage, it is also recommended to check the building services regularly and report any damage in good time. Above all, the landlord is obliged to determine the cause of water damage and to arrange for the damage.

developments in the legal dispute

The Causa Huber and Mühlbacher illustrates how complex the processing of water damage can be. In a similar case with considerable water damage in a daycare center, it was found that the clarification of responsibilities often leads to disputes. The district court decided that the applicant's insurance company had to reimburse a compensation of over 426,000 euros, since the damage was due to poorly executed renovation. In this context, it becomes clear how important an expert advice is for everyone involved in order to minimize consequential damage and to keep the costs under control.

The Situation remains tense for the tenants Huber and Mühlbacher. While the developers from LeitgöB Wohnbau do not make any further comments due to the ongoing procedure, the hope for an early solution is a long way off. Not only the question arises as to who covers the costs, but also what the health and financial consequences of water damage will look like for the affected residents. Consumers always have to keep in mind that they also have the right to reduce rent in the event of a dispute should result in considerable impairments.

water damage can have far -reaching consequences and must be approached with careful. According to Kanzlei-herfurtner.de, this is not only a question of financial security, but also the security of living conditions. An early message and professional assessment are essential in order to be able to clearly assess your own situation afterwards.